From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yu Luming Subject: Re: Re: Smart Battery System driver Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:34:11 +0800 Message-ID: <200509061734.11182.luming.yu@intel.com> References: <41E81C2C.8010809@bartol.udel.edu> <200509061448.12234.luming.yu@intel.com> <200509061041.21722.o.jansen@orb-net.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200509061041.21722.o.jansen-n+qsWun7DryELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: Olaf Jansen-Olliges List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 06 September 2005 16:41, Olaf Jansen-Olliges wrote: > Hi Luming, > > > Please try if this works too > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3851#c73 > > with this patch ( i applied it to a fresh 2.6.13 vanilla kernel ) a older > problem reoccured on my machine. When i type (fast) sometimes keystrokes > are missed. But the time for reading the battery state is OK. Can i give > you more information or help in debugging? Thanks for testing. Without ec_burst=1, the driver still use spin lock. If ec_burst=1 doesn't work for you, I will be a little supprised. > > With ec_burst=1 it seems to be slightly better but i'm afraid some keys are > lost then too. > So, please report any issue with ec_burst=1. Thanks, Luming ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf