From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fridtjof Busse Subject: ibm-acpi Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 08:16:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20050909081601.0071c822.fbusse@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but the MAINTAINERS-file in the kernel lists nobody else: Who is responsible for keeping ibm-acpi up2date in the kernel? The version in the kernel is 0.8, while 0.11 is the current available version. But since the ibm-acpi developers don't answer mails anymore, I can't figure out if they maintain the driver in the kernel themselves. Anyhow, the version in the kernel should be updated, especially since 0.11 doesn't build with the current kernel (2.6.13), though that's easy fixable (but still annoying). Thus a current in-kernel driver would be a good thing since it supports lots of new hardware. -- Fridtjof Busse ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf