From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] suspend: Cleanup calling of power off methods. Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:24:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20050921112448.0e121a3d.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050921101855.GD25297@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20050921104615.2e8dd7d5.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, pavel@suse.cz, len.brown@intel.com, drzeus-list@drzeus.cx, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ncunningham@cyclades.com, masouds@masoud.ir, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > > Famous last words, but the actual patch volume _has_ to drop off one day. > > In fact there doesn't seem to much happening out there wrt 2.6.15. > > Due to changes coming through git or that there will simply be fewer > things that need to be patched? We're at -rc2 and I only have only maybe 100 patches tagged for 2.6.15 at this time. The number of actual major features lined up for 2.6.15 looks relatively small too. As I said, famous last words. But we have to finish this thing one day ;) > As for 2.6.15 I know I have patches in the queue that I intend to send > out later this week, which probably count. I wonder if other developers > are similar. Possibly. Quite a few of the git trees are looking pretty fat. I need to get another kernel-status thingy out soon, but that takes many hours of bugzilla-poking.