public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
To: Ranjan Parthasarathy <Ranjan.Parthasarathy-IrU4XInhIXM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11 issues with S3
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:43:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050927124338.GA9484@openzaurus.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A60C83D027E224BAA4550FB1A2B120E9DFBB1-/0EpVhShIWCyvBr3IBtpkhUaVx6/PbGo@public.gmane.org>

Hi!

> I am trying to get S3 working on my system running a 2.6.11 (upgraded from
> 2.6.4) kernel. On boot up I can put the system to S3 and then wol using magic
> packets. Subsequent attempts to put the system to S3 fail with the error

Try with recent kernel.

> "stopping tasks failed (208 tasks remaining)". I tried changing the TIMEOUT
> from the default 6 HZ in kernel/power/process.c to a larger number and the
> system is now able to suspend but takes about 20 - 30 seconds for it to go to
> suspend. Why is it taking that long? Also shouldn't the timeout be dependent
> on the number of processes that we are trying to put to suspend vs a constant
> value?
>  
> On my system, the error is easily reproducible with a simple shell script
> that spawns a lot of processes. As the number of processes increase, after
> around 70 odd processes in the system I start seeing failures while trying to
> suspend.

It was not really design to work on stressed system, but feel free to fix it.
Sometimes even make -j 10 on kernel breaks it.
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-27 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-26 22:58 2.6.11 issues with S3 Ranjan Parthasarathy
     [not found] ` <4A60C83D027E224BAA4550FB1A2B120E9DFBB1-/0EpVhShIWCyvBr3IBtpkhUaVx6/PbGo@public.gmane.org>
2005-09-27 12:43   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-28 17:39 Ranjan Parthasarathy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050927124338.GA9484@openzaurus.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel-+zi9xunit7i@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Ranjan.Parthasarathy-IrU4XInhIXM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox