From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2]
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:06:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20051130010646.GD19515@wotan.suse.de>
References: <F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B3005456F00@hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> <20051129195336.GP19515@wotan.suse.de> <1133296540.4627.7.camel@mindpipe> <20051129205108.GQ19515@wotan.suse.de> <1133308505.4627.31.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1750736AbVK3BHI@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1133308505.4627.31.camel@mindpipe>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, kr@cybsft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, pluto@agmk.net, john.cooper@timesys.com, bene@linutronix.de, dwalker@mvista.com, trini@kernel.crashing.org, george@mvista.com
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

> But on my system gettimeofday uses the TSC and it's still ~35x slower
> than RDTSC:
> 
> rlrevell@mindpipe:~$ ./timetest 
> rdtsc: 10000 calls in 1079 usecs
> gettimeofday: 10000 calls in 36628 usecs

First if you run this on an Athlon 64 the measurement is likely
wrong because RDTSC can be speculated around. To get accurate
data you need to add synchronizing instructions.

Then you're likely running 32bit. It doesn't use vsyscall gettimeofday
yet, which makes it slower. 64bit would.

-Andi