public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@hell.org.pl>
To: Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Joseph Dunn <jdunn14@hotpop.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wake-on-lan
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:50:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120065045.GC30662@hell.org.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060120063637.GC27435@neo.rr.com>

Thus wrote Adam Belay:
> > Note also that there are very few explicit calls to pci_enable_wake() in
> > the whole tree. Linux doesn't set the PME-Enable bit properly, which
> > apparently results in WOL either working or not working. My understanding
> > is that the final outcome depends on what BIOS does to the card during
> > POST. Please see http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801 for a weird 
> > example.
> I'm in the process of overhauling the PCI layer's power management event
> support.  Basically, I'd like to catch ACPI GPE events and then walk the
> device tree in thier corresponding location to see if PME is set.  If so

Ouch. Registering a notify handler against the device's node is not enough?
AFAIR, the spec requires devices that triggered wake-up to be notified and
most DSDTs I've seen do it in one way or another (usually through _WAK).

> a function like ->wake() will be called for the device driver that owns
> the triggered device.  This should allow for even runtime PME usage.  I'm
> expecting to have a patch available for the PCI end of these changes soon.

What point is calling this when we're already up?

Obviously, I haven't seen the whole picture, but from what I know we
already have a .enable_wake callback that is ignored by both the core code
and the drivers. Perhaps extending this callback with platform hooks to
enable the corresponding GPE (die, /proc/acpi/wakeup, die!) and making sure
it actually is called would suffice?

Best regards,

-- 
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan@hell.org.pl

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-20  4:55 wake-on-lan Brown, Len
2006-01-20  5:16 ` wake-on-lan Karol Kozimor
2006-01-20  6:36   ` wake-on-lan Adam Belay
2006-01-20  6:50     ` Karol Kozimor [this message]
2006-01-20 21:56       ` wake-on-lan Adam Belay
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-08 17:45 wake-on-lan Joseph Dunn
2006-01-20  8:24 ` wake-on-lan Satoru Takeuchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060120065045.GC30662@hell.org.pl \
    --to=sziwan@hell.org.pl \
    --cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
    --cc=jdunn14@hotpop.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox