From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hinds Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Add lspnp support for sysfs Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:23:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20060122192306.GA20797@sonic.net> References: <20060120024731.GA27435@neo.rr.com> <200601131051.36906.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200601191650.59642.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <5004686.116921137837612492.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from b.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.19.5]:48053 "EHLO b.mail.sonic.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbWAVTYC (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:24:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5004686.116921137837612492.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Komuro Cc: Adam Belay , Len Brown , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu Castet , Li Shaohua , Bjorn Helgaas On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 07:00:12PM +0900, Komuro wrote: > > I want 'check_pnp_irq' api in the kernel pnp layer. > to avoid irq conflict between 16bit-pcmcia card > and on-board pnp-devices. > > for example, > int check_pnp_irq(int irq) > return 0 (unused) > -1 (used) > -2 (reserved) > > Below is a known problems and limitations > in the pcmcia-cs README-2.4 > > > The kernel PCMCIA package cannot be configured to use PnP BIOS calls > > for resource management. Recent kernels do have PnP BIOS support > > but the "glue" hasn't been written. The correct way to fix this would be to have the PnP layer reserve all resources defined by the PnP BIOS. -- Dave