From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/003]Fix unify mapping from pxm to node id. Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:15:17 -0800 Message-ID: <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> References: <20060123165644.C147.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060126074846.1a6dd300.pj@sgi.com> <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:56262 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932535AbWA1HQO (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:16:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Yasunori Goto Cc: akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, discuss@x86-64.org Yasunori-san, Thank-you for updating your patch. However I am still puzzled by one detail. Your latest patchset removes the defines: -#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS 256 /* 1 byte and no promises about values */ and: -#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS (256) but continues to have code using MAX_PXM_DOMAINS. I am unable to compile ia64 with it now, for lack of this define. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401