From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bob Picco" Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/003]Fix unify mapping from pxm to node id. Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:44:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20060129034434.GO7306@localhost> References: <20060123165644.C147.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060126074846.1a6dd300.pj@sgi.com> <20060128122758.CF50.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atlrel9.hp.com ([156.153.255.214]:26051 "EHLO atlrel9.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbWA2Ds7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:48:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060127231517.4c0ce573.pj@sgi.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Jackson Cc: Yasunori Goto , akpm@osdl.org, apw@shadowen.org, bob.picco@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, discuss@x86-64.org Paul Jackson wrote: [Sat Jan 28 2006, 02:15:17AM EST] > Yasunori-san, > > Thank-you for updating your patch. > > However I am still puzzled by one detail. > > Your latest patchset removes the defines: > -#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS 256 /* 1 byte and no promises about values */ > > and: > -#define MAX_PXM_DOMAINS (256) > > but continues to have code using MAX_PXM_DOMAINS. I am unable > to compile ia64 with it now, for lack of this define. > > -- > I won't rest till it's the best ... > Programmer, Linux Scalability > Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401 Hi Paul. MAX_PXM_DOMAINS is defined in include/acpi/acpi_numa.h. So I'm confused. I just built sn2 with Yasunori's patches applied to -mm3. I had previously built sn2 with a slightly different patch series of mine which Yasunori later incorporated most of into this patch series. Would you please send your .config and the error output from the build? thanks, bob