* [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful
@ 2006-02-07 3:29 Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Patrick Mochel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2006-02-07 3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi; +Cc: len.brown
[resend]
From: Jae-hyeon Park <jhpark@tuhep.phys.tohoku.ac.jp>
Identify which device is not power-manageable to make
the message more useful.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
---
drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2615-rc6g4.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ linux-2615-rc6g4/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handl
if (!device->flags.power_manageable) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN,
- "Device is not power manageable\n"));
+ "Device '%s' is not power manageable\n",
+ device->kobj.name));
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
}
/*
---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Patrick Mochel
@ 2006-02-07 18:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-09 18:30 ` Thomas Renninger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2006-02-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Mochel; +Cc: Randy.Dunlap, linux-acpi, len.brown
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:29:10PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> > Identify which device is not power-manageable to make
> > the message more useful.
>
>
> > --- linux-2615-rc6g4.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > +++ linux-2615-rc6g4/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handl
> >
> > if (!device->flags.power_manageable) {
> > ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN,
> > - "Device is not power manageable\n"));
> > + "Device '%s' is not power manageable\n",
> > + device->kobj.name));
>
>
> This is good information, but does it have to come in such a scary message?
> It appears that something is wrong with the device, when in fact, it just
> doesn't support an optional capability.
>
> Could we demote the message to e.g. ACPI_DB_INFO?
Sure, fine with me.
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful
2006-02-07 3:29 [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful Randy.Dunlap
@ 2006-02-07 18:18 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Mochel @ 2006-02-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: linux-acpi, len.brown
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:29:10PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Identify which device is not power-manageable to make
> the message more useful.
> --- linux-2615-rc6g4.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ linux-2615-rc6g4/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handl
>
> if (!device->flags.power_manageable) {
> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN,
> - "Device is not power manageable\n"));
> + "Device '%s' is not power manageable\n",
> + device->kobj.name));
This is good information, but does it have to come in such a scary message?
It appears that something is wrong with the device, when in fact, it just
doesn't support an optional capability.
Could we demote the message to e.g. ACPI_DB_INFO?
Thanks,
Patrick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2006-02-09 18:30 ` Thomas Renninger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2006-02-09 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy.Dunlap; +Cc: Patrick Mochel, linux-acpi, len.brown
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:29:10PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> Identify which device is not power-manageable to make
>>> the message more useful.
>>
>>> --- linux-2615-rc6g4.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> +++ linux-2615-rc6g4/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>>> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handl
>>>
>>> if (!device->flags.power_manageable) {
>>> ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN,
>>> - "Device is not power manageable\n"));
>>> + "Device '%s' is not power manageable\n",
>>> + device->kobj.name));
>>
>> This is good information, but does it have to come in such a scary message?
>> It appears that something is wrong with the device, when in fact, it just
>> doesn't support an optional capability.
>>
>> Could we demote the message to e.g. ACPI_DB_INFO?
>
I already moved this one with the big debug to error/warn ... patch.
It should now be ACPI_DB_INFO, but I did not add the device name though...
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-09 18:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-07 3:29 [PATCH] acpi: make message more descriptive/meaningful Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Patrick Mochel
2006-02-07 18:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-09 18:30 ` Thomas Renninger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox