From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Seyfried Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:06:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20060210080643.GA14763@suse.de> References: <20060208125753.GA25562@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:27592 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751185AbWBJIHF (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:07:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060208125753.GA25562@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:57:53PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > The included patch adds support for power management methods to regis= ter=20 > callbacks in order to allow drivers to check if the system is on AC o= r=20 > not. Following patches add support to ACPI and APM. Feedback welcome. Ok. Maybe i am not seeing the point. But why do we need this in the ker= nel? Can't we handles this easily in userspace? --=20 Stefan Seyfried \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices \ wanted to be paid for what I write.= " SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, N=FCrnberg \ -- Leonard Co= hen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html