From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Subject: Re: S3 sleep regression / 2.6.16-rc1+acpi-release-20060113
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:39:25 +1000
Message-ID: <200603131539.34635.ncunningham@cyclades.com>
References: <E1F5UPr-0008FN-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk> <200603131525.22991.ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2399682.2UaMtXR8W9";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from b3162.static.pacific.net.au ([203.143.238.98]:50135 "EHLO
	cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751463AbWCMFl5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:41:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200603131525.22991.ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

--nextPart2399682.2UaMtXR8W9
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hmm.

Having control-R do reply to all isn't always a good idea, is it? :)

Sorry for the spam!

Nigel

--nextPart2399682.2UaMtXR8W9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEFQWWN0y+n1M3mo0RAj36AKDTqtm1416c6BmZLCOyhUCwta0msACggx1o
qj1a5satO2kuuYSYiTLck1o=
=GNKj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2399682.2UaMtXR8W9--