public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Exit ACPI drivers immediately if acpi is disabled
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:18:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604210918.47337.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200604211243.32276.trenn@suse.de>

On Friday 21 April 2006 04:43, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> If booting with acpi=off and loading the processor module, it
> may happen that the kernel oopses when trying to unload the module again.
> Better exit all ACPI modules immediately if booted with acpi=off.
> ... 
> @@ -289,31 +289,28 @@ static int __init acpi_ac_init(void)
>  {
>  	int result = 0;
>  
> -	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ac_init");
> +	if (acpi_disabled)
> +		return -ENODEV;

This doesn't feel like the right solution to me.
acpi_bus_register_driver() already returns -ENODEV
if acpi_disabled, and that ought to be enough so the
drivers can handle this correctly.

I don't think we should clutter every ACPI driver with
the same check for acpi_disabled.

Did you investigate the oops when unloading the processor module?
I wonder if that driver has a bug there.  It has a mysterious
comment that "we keep the driver loaded even when ACPI is not
running" for powernow-k8.   I don't understand that at all, but
it sounds like it requires extra care to make sure everything
works right.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-21 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-21 10:43 Exit ACPI drivers immediately if acpi is disabled Thomas Renninger
2006-04-21 15:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2006-04-21 16:53   ` Thomas Renninger
2006-04-21 16:58     ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-04-21 17:18     ` Thomas Renninger
2006-04-24 10:52       ` Thomas Renninger
2006-04-24 14:59         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-04-24 15:57           ` Thomas Renninger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200604210918.47337.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox