From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Moore,
Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] ACPI: reduce code size, clean up, fix validator message
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:54:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060625195440.GC11494@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CFF307C98FEABE47A452B27C06B85BB6CF0D04@hdsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
* Brown, Len <len.brown@intel.com> wrote:
> Ingo,
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> An Andrew's advice a while back, Bob already got rid
> of the allocate part -- it just isn't upstream yet.
>
> Re: changing ACPICA code (sub-directories of drivers/acpi/) like this:
>
> >- flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> >+ spin_lock_irqsave(&acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
>
> I can't do that without either
> 1. diverging between Linux and ACPICA
> or
> 2. getting a license back from you to Intel such that Intel can
> re-distrubute such a change under the Intel license on the file and
> inventing spin_lock_irqsave() on about 9 other operating systems.
btw., regarding #2 i hereby put my patch (which i wrote in my free time)
into the public domain - feel free to reuse it in any way, shape or
form, under any license. (but it's trivial enough so i guess the only
copyrightable element is my changelog entry anyway ;)
> If this code were performance or size critical, I would still delete
> acpi_os_acquire_lock from osl.c, but would inline it in aclinux.h.
well its in the kernel so it's size critical by definition. But it's
certainly not a highprio thing.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-25 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 8:00 [patch] ACPI: reduce code size, clean up, fix validator message Brown, Len
2006-06-25 19:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-06-26 16:35 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-26 21:58 Brown, Len
2006-06-26 20:42 Moore, Robert
2006-06-26 17:39 Brown, Len
2006-06-26 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-22 4:28 2.6.17-mm1 - possible recursive locking detected Brown, Len
2006-06-22 4:59 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 7:20 ` [patch] ACPI: reduce code size, clean up, fix validator message Ingo Molnar
2006-06-22 14:31 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060625195440.GC11494@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox