From: "Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, castet.matthieu@free.fr
Cc: bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, akpm@osdl.org, ambx1@neo.rr.com
Subject: Re: Re: [patch 11/18] pnpacpi: reject ACPI_PRODUCER resources
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:57:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060628085744.74730@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1151456568.21189.84.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:02:48 +0800
Von: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
An: castet.matthieu@free.fr
Betreff: Re: [patch 11/18] pnpacpi: reject ACPI_PRODUCER resources
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:02 +0200, castet.matthieu@free.fr wrote:
> > Selon Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>:
> >
> > >
> >
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=c4bb6f5ad968540d7f9619565bacd18d7419b85f
> > > Thanks and sorry I didn't find the issue before. We'd better blacklist
> > > root bridge. I saw at lest one BIOS (IA64 box) didn't assign correct
> > > producer/consumer flag to root bridge resources. Blacklist it is much
> > > safer.
> >
> > Is only PNP0A03 is producer type in __all__ ACPI possible devices ?
> > If not we will have the same problem with others devices...
> >
> > I don't think blacklist is the solution : pnpacpi should be able to
> handle all
> > ressources types : we should complete the implementation instead of
> blacklist
> > devices our implementation doesn't support.
> >
> > If there are broken ACPI bios, there should be firmware update, a
> patched dsdt
> > or a quirk, but no "quirk and no generic solution".
> >>From my understanding, if the device is really a PNP device its resource
> should not be producer.
> Or could we take this way, merge both patches (both patches are good to
> me), which should be safer. Anyway, it doesn't make sense to export root
> bridge to pnp layer to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Shaohua
I tested the patch without blacklisting the PNP resource at the same time under 2.6.17-rc6-mm*, and did not find any regression.
And I am sure there is a solution also for IA64 architectures without going the blacklist path which sounds a bit strange after having done such a big effort of real good work.
Unfortunately I do not own an IA64 architecture, so I neither cannot test nor understand Shaohua´s criticism on that.
Under latest mm-patches (mm1, mm2, mm3 for official release of 2.6.17) it is at least impossible for me to give any positive feedback, as all three mm-versions are simply unusable. I will feature this in another mail to Andrew.
Cheers
Uwe
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-28 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-27 6:30 [patch 11/18] pnpacpi: reject ACPI_PRODUCER resources Brown, Len
2006-06-27 7:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 7:37 ` Adam Belay
2006-06-27 7:29 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-27 12:02 ` castet.matthieu
2006-06-27 14:19 ` Uwe Bugla
2006-06-27 16:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-06-28 1:02 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-28 8:57 ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2006-06-28 16:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-06-29 1:13 ` Shaohua Li
2006-06-29 12:24 ` Uwe Bugla
2006-06-29 18:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-06-30 1:30 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-29 12:41 Li, Shaohua
2006-06-30 9:04 ` Uwe Bugla
2006-06-30 16:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-07-03 8:19 ` Uwe Bugla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060628085744.74730@gmx.net \
--to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox