From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: SMBus access Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 09:01:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20060702090145.7fd8317d.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060701141015.a4922e86.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:11501 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932433AbWGBP7B (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:59:01 -0400 Received: from midway.site ([71.245.108.25]) by xenotime.net for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 08:58:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: jvromans@squirrel.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:41:56 +0200 Johan Vromans wrote: > "Randy.Dunlap" writes: > > > a. patch should also be sent to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (cc-ed) > > b. patch does not apply cleanly to latest kernel > > c. missing Signed-off-by: line (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > > d. incorrect patch filename directory level (see SubmittingPatches) > > All procedural issues, than can easily be solved. Agreed. > So I take it there > are no technical/philosophical/emotional/ethical objections against > this change? We are still waiting for feedback/comments to determine that. --- ~Randy