From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc4 (and earlier): CMOS clock corruption during suspend to disk on i386
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:12:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060810001232.GB4249@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608092251.58062.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi!
> > > > > It looks like the CMOS clock gets corrupted during the suspend to disk
> > > > > on i386. I've observed this on 2 different boxes. Moreover, one of them is
> > > > > AMD64-based and the x86_64 kernel doesn't have this problem on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, I've done some tests that indicate the corruption doesn't occur before
> > > > > saving the suspend image. It rather happens when the box is powered off
> > > > > or rebooted (tested both cases).
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, I have no more time to debug it further right now.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have Linus' "please corrupt my cmos for debuggin" hack enabled?
> > >
> > > Well, I know nothing about that. ;-)
> >
> > CONFIG_PM_TRACE=y will scrog your CMOS clock each time you suspend.
>
> Oh dear. Of course it's set in my .config. Thanks a lot for this hint. :-)
>
> BTW, it's a dangerous setting, because some drivers get mad if the time after
> the resume appears to be earlier than the time before the suspend. Also the
> timer .suspend/.resume routines aren't prepared for that.
Its config option should just go away. People comfortable using *that*
should just edit some header file. Rafael, could you do patch doing
something like that?
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-09 12:26 2.6.18-rc4 (and earlier): CMOS clock corruption during suspend to disk on i386 Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-09 12:30 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-09 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-09 20:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-09 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-10 0:12 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-08-10 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-10 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-12 19:08 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-08-12 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-13 22:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-14 8:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-13 22:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-09 17:44 ` john stultz
2006-08-09 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-08-09 20:13 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060810001232.GB4249@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox