From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 05:12:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20060901041221.GA15330@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200608311713.21618.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1157070616.7974.232.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:2986 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932070AbWIAEMf (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:12:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: jg@laptop.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Linux Kernel ML , Dominik Brodowski , ACPI ML , Adam Belay , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Arjan van de Ven , devel@laptop.org On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:53:04PM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > The Geode doesn't suport any C-states -- so ACPI wouldn't help them there anyway. Are you sure of that? The docs I have here suggest C1 and C2, but it's possible that that's just the companion chip and they aren't implemented in the CPU. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org