From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: patch [0/2]: acpi: add generic removable drive bay support Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:59:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20060908195922.GB17220@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20060907161305.67804d14.kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> <1157679256.3474.48.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:16819 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751149AbWIHUEA (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:04:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1157679256.3474.48.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:34:16AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Allow me to anticipate a question I'm sure will come: will this play > well with (say) suspending while docked and resuming undocked? Most hardware seems to send a bay event on resume. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org