From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add support for the generic backlight device to the TOSHIBA ACPI driver Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:56:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20061013145658.99de9f54.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20061013102419.GD4234@homac.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9951 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030212AbWJMV5D (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:57:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20061013102419.GD4234@homac.suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Holger Macht Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:24:19 +0200 Holger Macht wrote: > +static int set_lcd(int value) > +{ > + u32 hci_result; > + > + value = value << HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS_SHIFT; > + hci_write1(HCI_LCD_BRIGHTNESS, value, &hci_result); > + if (hci_result != HCI_SUCCESS) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + return 0; -EFAULT seems a bit random. Would -EIO be more appropriate?