From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] acpi-cpufreq: remove dead code Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:31:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20061021053139.GA24927@redhat.com> References: <200610202130.k9KLUUfN003257@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <200610210128.07621.len.brown@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:52685 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932222AbWJUFcO (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:32:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610210128.07621.len.brown@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:28:06AM -0400, Len Brown wrote: > I would expect to see this same change in both speedstep-centrino.c and acpi-cpufreq.c, no? Indeed, especially as longterm acpi-cpufreq is going to be the more interesting of the two. I'll merge this patch up though, and make the acpi-cpufreq change myself. Thanks, Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk