From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc <-> ThinkPads Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:17:54 +0100 Message-ID: <200611011817.55024.ak@suse.de> References: <20061101055435.GB4933@mellanox.co.il> <20061101061857.GC4933@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:32927 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946942AbWKARZ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:25:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061101061857.GC4933@mellanox.co.il> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ernst Herzberg , Len Brown , Adrian Bunk , Hugh Dickins , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@osdl.org, Martin Lorenz On Wednesday 01 November 2006 07:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Quoting r. Michael S. Tsirkin : > > What I plan to do is using eea0e11c1f0d6ef89e64182b2f1223a4ca2b74a2 > > for a couple of days and see how this works out. > > Ugh. Unfortunately in that kernel version, the e1000 driver says > the eeprom checksum is bad (works fine with 2.6.19-rc3). > So, I tried some suspends/resumes and things seem to work, but > I won't be able to test it under real use conditions. > > But maybe its another red herring? > Andi, could you maybe look at that commit and tell me whether > it could cause troubles with ACPI after suspend/resume even > theoretically? It touches suspend/resume so it could break something theoretically. -Andi