From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: ACPI breakage (Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2)) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 11:05:14 -0800 Message-ID: <200611181105.15421.david-b@pacbell.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp112.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.211]:9094 "HELO smtp112.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753872AbWKRVdJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:33:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy , Linus Torvalds Cc: Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , "Brown, Len" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote: > > > Or may be because it fixes all the current AMD-HP notebooks? Whatever "it" is sure broke mine though... the one that's currently on my lap! :) Running right now with a patch reverting the update which made trouble on Linus' machine, but without Alexey's two tweaks to the EC interrupt handler. So far so good, even after doing things which had previously caused AE_TIME errors pretty quickly. But then, the errors weren't what I'd call reproducible either. Linus' explanation of what went wrong looks compatible with the symptoms I've seen, FWIW. - Dave