From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: ACPI breakage (Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2)) Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20061118221627.GD31879@stusta.de> References: <200611181105.15421.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:7185 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755268AbWKRWQ3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:16:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Brownell , Alexey Starikovskiy , Andrew Morton , "Brown, Len" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:09:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, David Brownell wrote: > > > > Running right now with a patch reverting the update which > > made trouble on Linus' machine, but without Alexey's two > > tweaks to the EC interrupt handler. So far so good, even > > after doing things which had previously caused AE_TIME > > errors pretty quickly. But then, the errors weren't what > > I'd call reproducible either. > > Ok, goodie. > > Adrian, that means that there's one less regression on your list, unless > David reports that he can reproduce it again (I don't think he will be > able to: all the other ACPI changes looked relatively harmless, at least > in the particular area of ACPI changes I looked at) I had already removed it from my list based on David's email. > Linus cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed