From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI breakage (Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2))
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 10:46:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611201046.07375.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611182033.56332.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Saturday 18 November 2006 8:33 pm, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 18 November 2006 11:05 am, David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > Running right now with a patch reverting the update which
> > made trouble on Linus' machine, but without Alexey's two
> > tweaks to the EC interrupt handler. So far so good, even
> > after doing things which had previously caused AE_TIME
> > errors pretty quickly. But then, the errors weren't what
> > I'd call reproducible either.
>
> Hmm, well after a reboot to sort out some other patches,
> and at uptime of ~2 hours, I noticed confusion about
> whether AC or battery power was active, then the old:
>
> ACPI Exception (evregion-0424): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20060707]
> ACPI Exception (dswexec-0458): AE_TIME, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] [20060707]
> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node ffff810002032d10), AE_TIME
>
> So maybe that's not the entire story; sigh.
Whatever it is, it hasn't shown its ugly little face since then.
So while it doesn't seem completely fixed ... it's nowhere near
as broken as it was previously.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-20 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-18 16:23 ACPI breakage (Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2)) Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2006-11-18 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-18 19:05 ` David Brownell
2006-11-18 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-18 22:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-19 4:33 ` David Brownell
2006-11-20 18:46 ` David Brownell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-18 19:01 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
2006-11-18 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <455FB44C.8050103@linux.intel.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611182048560.3692@woody.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <456043F7.1030105@linux.intel.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611201003540.3692@woody.osdl.org>
2006-11-20 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-20 19:31 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-21 3:10 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-11-20 22:13 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611152008450.3349@woody.osdl.org>
2006-11-17 20:40 ` 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-17 23:58 ` ACPI breakage (Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v2)) Linus Torvalds
2006-11-18 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611201046.07375.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox