From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:04:25 -0800 Message-ID: <200611221604.26982.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <20061121212424.GQ5200@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.210]:22867 "HELO smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757242AbWKWAlM (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:41:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061121212424.GQ5200@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , Linus Torvalds , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Tuesday 21 November 2006 1:24 pm, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject : ACPI: AE_TIME errors > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/15/12 > Submitter : David Brownell > Handled-By : Len Brown > Alexey Starikovskiy > Status : problem is being debugged I've not seen this in over 3 days now, and am willing to believe that the previous instance (after manually reverting the patch identified by Linus) was a fluke ... it's certainly not the critical/blocking kind of issue it had previously been. - Dave