From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/22] acpi4asus sync with 0.31 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:42:24 -0500 Message-ID: <200612200242.24745.lenb@kernel.org> References: <200612192217.43660.corentincj@iksaif.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:59073 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752963AbWLTHnE (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:43:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200612192217.43660.corentincj@iksaif.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: corentincj@iksaif.net Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:17, Corentin CHARY wrote: > Hi, > This set of patch is against 2.6.19. It add support for many > models, /sys/class/backlight/, Light Sens, etc ... There is also a lot of > cleanups. And the most important, a new system to handle unsupported models. > > Patch from 0 to 10 are change and cleanups in the driver. > Patch from 11t to 21 add support for new models. > > All the following patchs are available here : > Great! When this series is formatted to apply, what tree is it supposed to apply to? How does it relate to the two asus_acpi patches in the mm tree right now -- 13/19 and 19/19 that akpm forwarded to the list yesterday. How does it relate to the acpi-test tree, which already includes the backlight patch to asus_acpi from Holger Macht? thanks -Len