From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch 19/19] asus_acpi: Add support for Asus Z81SP Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:06:22 -0500 Message-ID: <200701050206.22992.lenb@kernel.org> References: <200612192056.kBJKuP7b010068@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <200612222113.24023.lenb@kernel.org> <20061222201511.e9f6ef16.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:53998 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030358AbXAEHHZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:07:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061222201511.e9f6ef16.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, calvinmc@gmail.com, acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net On Friday 22 December 2006 23:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:13:23 -0500 > Len Brown wrote: > > > NAK > > > > The proper way to update the asus_acpi driver > > is through its (new) maintainer and mailing list on acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > which will forward the patches through the acpi tree when tested. > > > > So why the NAK? The patch is good, isn't it? Okay, call it lack of an ACK:-) When it comes from the asus_acpi maintainer having passed the muster of the acpi4asus-user list I'll be delighted to apply it. cheers, -Len