From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.20-rc4 regression] ibm-acpi: bay support disabled
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:45:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070109174534.GN25007@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070109172845.GA3528@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:28:45PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> A new one for you, it exists since 2.6.20-rc2.
>
> Subject : ThinkPad removable bay support disabled unconditionally
> References : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-acpi&m=116750681901208&w=2
> Caused-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> Status : patch attached
Thanks, noted.
> From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
>
> ACPI: ibm-acpi: fix Kconfig entries for ibm-acpi bay and dock
>
> Support for ACPI_BAY has not been merged in mainline yet. Usage of
> "depends on FOO=n" fails if FOO is undefined, thus ibm-acpi support
> for bay was being made non-available in a kernel that has no other
> sort of bay support.
>
> Fix it to use "depends on ! FOO" instead, that does the right thing
> when FOO is undefined. Fix ACPI_IBM_DOCK accordingly as well while
> at it, and also improve the help text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 1639998..34cc8d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -215,26 +215,29 @@ config ACPI_IBM
> config ACPI_IBM_DOCK
> bool "Legacy Docking Station Support"
> depends on ACPI_IBM
> - depends on ACPI_DOCK=n
> - default n
> + depends on ! ACPI_DOCK
> + default y
>...
!ACPI_DOCK is wrong if the intention was ACPI_DOCK=n (since ACPI_DOCK is
a tristate).
I'd say the right fix is to remove the negative dependencies on unmerged
options and reintroduce them once these options themselves got merged.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-09 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-09 17:28 [2.6.20-rc4 regression] ibm-acpi: bay support disabled Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-01-09 17:45 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-01-09 18:54 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[not found] ` <20070109185422.GB3528-ZGHd14iZgfaRjzvQDGKj+xxZW9W5cXbT@public.gmane.org>
2007-01-11 7:59 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070109174534.GN25007@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).