From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Power S3 Resume Optimization Patch. Request for Comment Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:51:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20070122125145.GA4276@ucw.cz> References: <20070119092936.GA5590@ucw.cz> <5B3EF00AF56209498A59172917BFE8130168F0B6@bgsmsx412.gar.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:1154 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751763AbXAVM4j (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:56:39 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5B3EF00AF56209498A59172917BFE8130168F0B6@bgsmsx412.gar.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Seshadri, Harinarayanan" Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > My initial idea was to execute only block device resume on the separate > thread, as it take almost 80% of the total device resume time ( I did If you do this in one block driver that is slow for you (sata?), then it is probably acceptable. (Maintainer decides.) I'd encourage that option. If you want to do it for _all_ block devices, you'll probably have to audit all of them. _Lot_ of work. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html