From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:50:45 -0500 Message-ID: <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> References: <200701242346.44673.pluto@agmk.net> <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?q?Pawe=C5=82_Sikora?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Pawe=C5=82 Sikora wrote: > > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot: > > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg > > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps. > > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like > > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need. >=20 > thanks for your report. >=20 > Can you narrow down a bit when it started? > Is 2.6.19 OK? > Is 2.6.18 OK? Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me. if AMD cool & quiet is enabled in the BIOS, but CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=3Dn in the kernel, do you see the same problem? thanks, =2DLen