From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?q?Pawe=C5=82_Sikora?= Subject: Re: 2.6.20rc5 k8/acpi regression ( 2.6.17.13 works fine ). Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:54:16 +0100 Message-ID: <200701252154.16723.pluto@agmk.net> References: <200701242346.44673.pluto@agmk.net> <20070124225238.GT17836@stusta.de> <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701242350.45276.lenb@kernel.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Len Brown , Adrian Bunk , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 25 of January 2007 05:50:45 Len Brown wrote: > On Wednesday 24 January 2007 17:52, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:46:44PM +0100, Pawe=C5=82 Sikora wrote: > > > for 2.6.20rc5 i get an acpi related oops during x86-64 boot: > > > http://minus.ds14.agh.edu.pl/~pluto/2.6.20rc5-acpi-oops.jpg > > > disabling the "amd-k8 cool'n'quiet" option in bios helps. > > > moreover, it works fine for 2.6.17.13, so it looks like > > > a recent regression. i can provide more details if you need. > > > > thanks for your report. > > > > Can you narrow down a bit when it started? > > Is 2.6.19 OK? > > Is 2.6.18 OK? ok, here are results of my tests: M/B: http://www.epox.nl/products/view.php?product_id=3D421 $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 55 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+ stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2200.000 cache size : 1024 KB fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge = mca=20 cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm=20 3dnowext 3dnow pni lahf_lm bogomips : 4423.06 TLB size : 1024 4K pages clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts fid vid ttp amd-k8 cool'n'quiet enabled in bios. 2.6.17.13-uni, 2.6.17.14-smp, 2.6.18.6-smp and 2.6.20rc5-uni work. 2.6.20rc5-smp ooopses during boot but works if c'n'q is disabled. pure 2.6.19.x not tested yet... > Is the stack trace always the same? It doesn't make much sense to me= =2E > > if AMD cool & quiet is enabled in the BIOS, but CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=3Dn > in the kernel, do you see the same problem? looks like not related to config_cpu_freq.