From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: sbs driver Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:10:22 -0500 Message-ID: <200701260410.24361.lenb@kernel.org> References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE7839BD@mssmsx411> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:37914 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030842AbXAZJL5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:11:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE7839BD@mssmsx411> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Lebedev, Vladimir P" Cc: "Starikovskiy, Alexey Y" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Monday 27 November 2006 21:25, Lebedev, Vladimir P wrote: > > Len, > > Attached patch contains new release of sbs driver. > > The sbs driver was cleaned and restructured. Patch is based on > 2.6.19-rc6-mm1. It was tested on Acer 2300 laptop. I suggest add patch > to mm tree. Vladimir, Looks like we failed to merge this one. (in general, if I don't ack or somehow respond within a week or so, re-ping. This one was sent the day after Thanksgiving here in the US and I never saw it) Is this patch entirely clean-up, or are there any functional changes? Sifting through the 1500 line patch it was hard to tell, but it looked to be at least mostly cleanup, with maybe some of the errors messages changed. Please refresh this patch against 2.6.20-rc6 If there are any functional changes, please split them out into a single patch per logical change and send a series and provide check in comments describing exactly what changed and why. thanks, -Len