From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Henri Hunnekens <henrihunnekens@gmail.com>
Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373! (acpi-cpufreq)
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:52:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702161152.24710.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9f486400702160703pb3912e3m874daae8665c5cbb@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 16 February 2007 10:03, Henri Hunnekens wrote:
> Loading the acpi_cpufreq module reports a kernel bug using kernel
> version 2.6.20. versions 2.6.18 and older work fine.
> kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373!
> [<e0074455>] acpi_cpufreq_target+0x185/0x290 [acpi_cpufreq]
> [<c037881f>] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x3f/0x50
> [<c037a0de>] cpufreq_governor_performance+0x1e/0x30
> [<c0378984>] __cpufreq_governor+0x24/0xd0
> [<c0378e9b>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0xeb/0x140
> [<c03790fe>] cpufreq_set_policy+0x4e/0x80
> [<c0379d4a>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x31a/0x3e0
> [<c02bdfc9>] sysdev_driver_register+0x59/0xa0
> [<c037a027>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x67/0x100
> [<e007809d>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0x9d/0xa4 [acpi_cpufreq]
> [<c01423f7>] sys_init_module+0x137/0x1b90
> [<c0104620>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> =======================
> Code: f9 10 89 e5 53 89 c3 89 d0 74 12 83 f9 20 74 16 83 f9 08 75 16 0f b6 c2 89
> da ee eb 12 0f b7 c2 89 da 66 ef eb 09 89 da ef eb 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 5b 31 c0 5d
> c3 55 89 e5 5d c3 55 85 c0 89 e5 89 c1
> EIP: [<c027dbd9>] acpi_os_write_port+0x2d/0x36 SS:ESP 0068:dd3d1c8c
acpi_status acpi_os_write_port(acpi_io_address port, u32 value, u32 width)
{
switch (width) {
case 8:
outb(value, port);
break;
case 16:
outw(value, port);
break;
case 32:
outl(value, port);
break;
default:
373: BUG();
}
return AE_OK;
}
Well, acpi_os_write_port itself has not changed -- so it
is either acpi_cpufreq, cpufreq, or how they've read and interpreted the tables.
Please attach the output from acpidump > acpidump.out into a new bugzilla entry here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=ACPI
You can get acpidump from the latest pmtools here:
http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/utils/
Also, you can build with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y and boot with "acpi_dbg_layer=2"
plus "acpi_dbg_level=0xffffffff" and capture the console log.
(or you can set these values after booted in /proc/acpi just before
you try to load the module)
and, maybe some clues from the cpufreq subsystem will help.
cpufreq.debug=3 looks like it may give us a clue.
thanks,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 15:03 kernel BUG at drivers/acpi/osl.c:373! (acpi-cpufreq) Henri Hunnekens
2007-02-16 16:52 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-02-16 17:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-02-16 18:05 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-03-03 7:54 ` Henri Hunnekens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702161152.24710.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=henrihunnekens@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox