From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: serial port discovery on a motion computing tablet Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:35:34 +0000 Message-ID: <20070314143534.GA2655@srcf.ucam.org> References: <45F7688B.8000101@elevating.com> <20070314134323.GC1467@srcf.ucam.org> <45F806B1.3060807@elevating.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:59528 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161301AbXCNOf6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:35:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F806B1.3060807@elevating.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bret Hughes Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:29:05AM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote: > nothing there: > [root@localhost serial]# ls -a /sys/bus/pnp/devices/ > . .. That's, uh, surprising - is CONFIG_PNPACPI set? > Now that I am back at the office and looking at the kernel .config via > make xconfig I see that 8250/16550 device discovery via ACPI namespace > (SERIAL_8250_ACPI) is not enabled. Is is safe to assume that it should > be (go ahead and groan, I probably would) anything else that should be > included? Hm. How old is this kernel? SERIAL_8250_ACPI was merged into SERIAL_8250_PNP a while back. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org