Re: CONFIG_IBM_BAY

Kristen Carlson Accardi
2007-03-15T15:09:39Z

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:39:00 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> > > +config ACPI_IBM_BAY
> >
> > Should this depend on ACPI_BAY=n?
>
> It should allow both as modules, so that the user can choose which one to
> run.

Doesn't this option enable support for controlling the bay device via ibm_acpi?
If so - if you compile this one, then the user who chooses to use bay.ko instead
to control the bay can not use ibm_acpi at all to control the remaining
functionality. I feel this should be dependent on ACPI_BAY=n.