Re: CONFIG_IBM_BAY

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-03-19T23:04:20Z

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Userspace wants to (non-force-)-unmount by itself after (1), so it can
> stop the eject process if the filesystems cannot be cleanly
> unmounted. So the force-unmount at (3) ends up being a redundant
> safety measure at best.

More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told
to". We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to
force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject).

--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash