public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andika Triwidada <andika@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU offline but power consumption increased?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:13:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704100413.51637.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73odlzkb6h.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

On Saturday 07 April 2007 19:38, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "Andika Triwidada" <andika@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> [cc linux-acpi]
>  
> > Question: is that normal? I thought power consumption will be
> > automatically reduced if one core offlined.

Known?  Yes.
What people would expect? No.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471

> The current cpu offline essentially just runs a special idle loop.
> The standard idle loop is even a bit more aggressive on some systems
> because it knows about the deeper ACPI sleep modi.
> 
> There are also dependencies between cores because current CPUs
> have shared power planes between cores.
> 
> I suppose in the future when a whole socket goes off line one could
> implement special code to turn off the CPU further. But it likely
> won't work on older hardware.

Speaking for all Intel hardware implemented from pre-history until now,
deep C-states is the best you can do, and there is no special offline
mode to save more power.

If you really want to not use a core and the above bug isn't fixed in linux,
you can use maxcpus=1 to never bring the other core on-line in the first place,
and if the BIOS is implemented properly, the core will be spinning in the
deepest available C-state.  Of course, it would probably be more interesting
to simply leave the core on-line and let it go idle...

-Len

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-10  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <7e0bae390704062123i2dfaf030icd5a710677bc989a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-07 23:38 ` CPU offline but power consumption increased? Andi Kleen
2007-04-10  8:13   ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-04-10 13:44     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704100413.51637.lenb@kernel.org \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=andika@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox