public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: malattia@linux.it
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	stelian@popies.net
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] [RFC] sonypi ACPI reimplementation (resend 3)
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704101613.43751.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070409081903.057292676@linux.it>

On Monday 09 April 2007 04:19, malattia@linux.it wrote:
> [Resend 3: hopefully this time it will make to the list and the intended
> recipients]
> 
> The following patch series is the state of the art of my work toward
> reimplementing sonypi into sony-laptop. Most patches are mostly cosmetic
> to try to obtain a decent namespace separation between the used
> subsystems and the drivers driving the two sony devices (SNC and SPIC).
> If suitable it would be nice to start applying to acpi-test so that akpm
> gets them in -mm (update: it's already in .21-rc6-mm1).
> 
> Len, if you prefer a big large patch or a different series, just ask.

This is fine, thanks.

> The most interesting patches are probably 0004, 0006 and 0009.
> Andrew, the 9th patch is now really against acpi-test (I think the Kconfig hunk
> didn't apply correclty).

BTW. I check-in on top of Linus' tree, not on top of acpi-test.
Then i merge into acpi-test.  So in the future, you could just as well base
on Linus' tree and let me deal with the conflicts within acpi-test.
fine with me either way, just mention where the base is like you have.

> 0001-Remove-ACPI-references-from-variable-and-function-names.patch
> 0002-prepare-pfdriver-for-multiple-users.patch
> 0003-introduce-debug-macros.patch
> 0004-add-sny6001-device-handling-from-sonypi.patch
> 0005-unify-input-subsystem-event-fwd.patch
> 0006-add-SNY6001-platform-attributes.patch
> 0007-sanitize-printk-logs.patch
> 0008-update-documentation.patch
> 0009-add-sonypi-compat-code.patch
> ---
>  Documentation/sony-laptop.txt |   25 
>  drivers/misc/Kconfig          |   15 
>  drivers/misc/sony-laptop.c    | 2019 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 1842 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)


>SONY_LAPTOP_OLD 

There is probably a better name for this -- like SONY_PI_COMPATIBILITY or something.

What about CONFIG_SONYPI? -- should it now depend on this driver not being included?

SONYPI depends on !64BIT -- is that invalid, or perhaps you only need the compatibility
stuff only in 32-bit mode?

applied to acpi-test.

It would be great if you can get some test feedback for the sonypi-era features
to make sure that the code moved into the new driver works as well as the old sonypi.

thanks,
-Len

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-10 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070409081903.057292676@linux.it>
2007-04-09 17:18 ` [patch 1/9] Remove ACPI references from variable and function names malattia
2007-04-09 17:20 ` [patch 2/9] Prepare the platform driver for multiple users malattia
2007-04-09 17:22 ` [patch 3/9] Add debug macros also used by the sonypi reimplementation malattia
2007-04-09 17:26 ` [patch 4/9] Add SNY6001 device handling (sonypi reimplementation) malattia
2007-04-09 17:28 ` [patch 5/9] Unify the input subsystem event forwarding malattia
2007-04-09 17:28 ` [patch 6/9] additional platform attributes coming from SNY6001 malattia
2007-04-09 17:31 ` [patch 7/9] sanitize printks malattia
2007-04-09 17:31 ` [patch 8/9] update documentation and Kconfig help malattia
2007-04-09 17:31 ` [patch 9/9] sonypi backward compatibility code malattia
2007-04-10 20:13 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-04-10 22:04   ` [patch 0/9] [RFC] sonypi ACPI reimplementation (resend 3) Mattia Dongili
2007-04-12  9:20     ` Stelian Pop
2007-04-09 17:15 malattia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704101613.43751.lenb@kernel.org \
    --to=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malattia@linux.it \
    --cc=stelian@popies.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox