From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/20] ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: uncouple subdriver init from ibms struct Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:40:51 -0400 Message-ID: <200704212340.51550.lenb@kernel.org> References: <11771645253042-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <11771645271352-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:56513 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754003AbXDVDtX (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:49:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <11771645271352-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh On Saturday 21 April 2007 10:08, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > Move the .init method from ibms struct to another struct, and use a list > head to control which subdrivers have been activated. > > This allows us to have the subdriver init methods marked __init, saving > quite a lot of .text size, and even a bit of .data size as some data can > now be made __initdata. does this save any space when the driver is compiled as a module? -Len