From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: mactel-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sven Anders <anders@anduras.de>,
mactel <mactel-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Nicolas Boichat <nicolas@boichat.ch>
Subject: Re: [Mactel-linux-users] C4 state problem
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:10:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704280210.23848.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4616D602.2090706@anduras.de>
On Friday 06 April 2007 19:21, Sven Anders wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I spend my day analysing why the Linux could not use the C4 state(s).
> Here my results...
>
> For a start we take a look at the current available c-states:
>
> #> cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU?/power
>
> active state: C3
> max_cstate: C8
> bus master activity: 00000000
> maximum allowed latency: 8000 usec
> states:
> C1: type[C1] promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[001]
> usage[00002590] duration[00000000000000000000]
> C2: type[C2] promotion[C3] demotion[C1] latency[001]
> usage[00002086] duration[00000000000006795863]
> *C3: type[C3] promotion[--] demotion[C2] latency[055]
> usage[00003633] duration[00000000000009200376]
First note that there are "hardware C-states", and "ACPI C-states".
The table above shows the ACPI C-states that the BIOS makes visible to the OS.
The BIOS (via the FADT or _CST) can map any hardware C-state it wants
to ACPI C3. It is likely that you are already getting hardware C4
and simply skipping over hardware C3.
If you provide the complete raw output from acpidump, then it should be
possible to tell.
cheers,
-Len
parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-28 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <4616D602.2090706@anduras.de>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704280210.23848.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=anders@anduras.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mactel-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mactel-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nicolas@boichat.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox