From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [patch 2.6.21-git] pci_choose_state() works, does ACPI magic
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514093916.GA12074@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705091222.29561.david-b@pacbell.net>
Hi!
> Provide new ACPI method tracking the target system state, for use
> during suspend() and other PM calls. It returns ACPI_STATE_S0
> except during true suspend paths.
>
> Use that to finally implement the platform_pci_choose_state() hook
> on ACPI platforms. It calls "_S3D" and similar methods, and uses
> the result appropriately.
>
> Fix pci_choose_state() to finally behave sanely too.
>
> Minor whitespace fixes.
>
> Lightly tested -- STR only, with only USB affected by the new code.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 29 +++++++++++-
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 51 ++++++++++++---------
> include/acpi/acpixf.h | 2
> 4 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> --- g26.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2007-05-09 08:57:37.000000000 -0700
> +++ g26/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c 2007-05-09 08:58:33.000000000 -0700
> @@ -35,6 +35,20 @@ static u32 acpi_suspend_states[] = {
>
> static int init_8259A_after_S1;
>
> +static u8 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_get_target_sleep_state - return target ACPI S-state
> + *
> + * When used during suspend processing, this returns the target state
> + * such as ACPI_STATE_S3. Otherwise it returns ACPI_STATE_S0.
> + */
> +int acpi_get_target_sleep_state(void)
> +{
> + return acpi_target_sleep_state;
> +}
> +/* EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_target_sleep_state); ... if you need it */
> +
> /**
> * acpi_pm_prepare - Do preliminary suspend work.
> * @pm_state: suspend state we're entering.
This is quite an ugly hack, right? Is it really neccessary to use
global variable for this?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-09 19:22 [patch 2.6.21-git] pci_choose_state() works, does ACPI magic David Brownell
2007-05-10 20:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-10 20:35 ` David Brownell
2007-05-14 9:39 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-05-14 15:01 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2007-05-21 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-05-21 17:55 ` David Brownell
2007-05-21 18:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-05-21 18:58 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070514093916.GA12074@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox