From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] vaio laptop (SZ72B) immediately resumes after STR
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:22:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705201822.24138.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070521004119.GA3103@inferi.kami.home>
On Sunday 20 May 2007, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> $ cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
> Device S-state Status Sysfs node
> PWRB S4 *enabled
> S1F0 S4 disabled
> S1F1 S4 disabled
> S1F2 S4 disabled
> S1F3 S4 disabled
> S1F4 S4 disabled
> S1F5 S4 disabled
> S1F6 S4 disabled
> S1F7 S4 disabled
> TLAN S3 disabled pci:0000:07:00.0
> DLAN S3 disabled
> S6F0 S4 disabled
> S6F1 S4 disabled
> S6F2 S4 disabled
> S6F3 S4 disabled
> S6F4 S4 disabled
> S6F5 S4 disabled
> S6F6 S4 disabled
> S6F7 S4 disabled
> USB1 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:1d.0
> USB2 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:1d.1
> USB3 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:1d.2
> USB4 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:1d.3
> USB7 S3 disabled pci:0000:00:1d.7
> SLT0 S4 disabled
> LANC S3 disabled
> EC0 S5 disabled
That's strangely busy ... what ARE all those devices? :)
But only the PCI ones -- or certain devices connected to USB
root hubs -- could be affected by that patch.
So another experiment you could do, if you want faster info
than "git bisect" can provide, is building drivers for those
PCI devices as modules (ehci-hcd, uhci-hcd, sky2) and then
finding which one causes the trouble by removing them before
STR.
> $ cat /proc/bus/usb/devices
>
> T: Bus=05 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 2
> B: Alloc= 45/900 us ( 5%), #Int= 1, #Iso= 1
> D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
> P: Vendor=0000 ProdID=0000 Rev= 2.06
> S: Manufacturer=Linux 2.6.22-rc1-mm1-bisect uhci_hcd
> S: Product=UHCI Host Controller
> S: SerialNumber=0000:00:1d.3
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr= 0mA
^^
Just FYI, any USB device with the 0x20 bit set could in
some cases become a wakeup event source. All hubs (root
and otherwise) set that. So do a couple of the devices
you show ...
> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
> E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 2 Ivl=255ms
>
> ...
>
> T: Bus=04 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
> P: Vendor=0483 ProdID=2016 Rev= 0.01
> S: Manufacturer=STMicroelectronics
> S: Product=Biometric Coprocessor
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=100mA
^^
This one does. I seem to recall hearing about some trouble associated
with this and sleep/wakeup processing, but I forget about the
details.
> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none)
> E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 64 Ivl=0ms
> E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 4 Ivl=20ms
>
> ...
>
>
> $ sudo ethtool eth0
> Settings for eth0:
> Supported ports: [ TP ]
> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
> Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
> Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
> Speed: 100Mb/s
> Duplex: Full
> Port: Twisted Pair
> PHYAD: 0
> Transceiver: internal
> Auto-negotiation: on
> Supports Wake-on: pg
> Wake-on: d
So wake-on-LAN is disabled here ... it *should* avoid
turning on the PCI wake mechanisms. On the other hand,
a quick look at that driver shows that it's rather
broken in how it calls pci_enable_wake().
> Current message level: 0x000000ff (255)
> Link detected: yes
>
> $ sudo ethtool -i eth0
> driver: sky2
> version: 1.14
> firmware-version: N/A
> bus-info: 0000:07:00.0
>
> > And, for a bit more info, the output of the appended script.
>
> on acpi_system:00/device:00/PNP0C0C:00
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb1
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/usb5
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/usb4/4-1
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2/usb4
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.2
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb3
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/usb2
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0
> on pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.2/0000:07:00.0
Other than the curious lack of labeling on the USB and
network nodes there (maybe the script cares about the
legacy sysfs files? it's a couple years old now) that
doesn't say anything new.
> > My suspicion, based on the dmesg and seeing what drivers actually
> > try to enable wakeup, would be the 'sky2' driver. The other two
>
> FWIW the sky2 is never functional upon resume, I need to ifdown, rmmod,
> modprobe and ifup again to get some networking...
Try "rmmod sky2" *before* suspend, to see if that matters.
Also "rmmod uhci-hcd", which will keep USB from doing anything
with that biometric thingie.
I suspect one or the other of those will be the issue.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 7:15 [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] vaio laptop (SZ72B) immediately resumes after STR Mattia Dongili
2007-05-18 7:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-19 6:48 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-19 7:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-19 15:11 ` 2.6.22-rc1 regression: tifm prevents suspending [was: Re: [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] vaio laptop (SZ72B) immediately resumes after STR] Mattia Dongili
2007-05-19 16:43 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-19 17:17 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-19 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-05-19 20:50 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-05-20 6:14 ` [2.6.22-rc1-mm1] vaio laptop (SZ72B) immediately resumes after STR Mattia Dongili
2007-05-20 6:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-20 6:59 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-20 18:38 ` David Brownell
2007-05-21 0:41 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-05-21 1:22 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-05-21 2:05 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-19 8:57 ` Zhang Rui
2007-06-19 9:30 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-19 9:55 ` Zhang Rui
2007-06-19 11:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-20 1:52 ` Zhang Rui
2007-06-20 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-06-22 10:08 ` David Brownell
2007-06-22 14:33 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2007-06-19 10:09 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-19 14:20 ` Alan Stern
2007-06-20 14:45 ` [linux-pm] " Mattia Dongili
2007-06-20 16:33 ` Alan Stern
2007-06-21 6:42 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-21 7:28 ` Zhang Rui
2007-06-21 9:22 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-21 15:45 ` Alan Stern
2007-06-22 9:22 ` Mattia Dongili
2007-06-22 9:43 ` David Brownell
2007-06-22 14:07 ` Alan Stern
2007-06-22 10:02 ` David Brownell
2007-06-22 14:22 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705201822.24138.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=malattia@linux.it \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox