public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: david-b@pacbell.net
Subject: RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:03:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070527190351.GA21387@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)

f5f72b46c349fefcfd4421b2213c6ffb324c5e56 appears to break the userspace 
interface to the CMOS alarm. This could previously be accessed via 
/proc/acpi/alarm, but if RTC_DRV_CMOS is enabled that vanishes. The help 
text for the module doesn't mention this, which makes tracking it down a 
touch irritating.

I'm not actually sure why this is the case. It doesn't look like the two 
interfaces are fundamentally incompatible. I agree that removing the 
proc code is a good long-term aim, but it'd be nice to be able to test 
the new RTC code without removing existing functionality.

(It doesn't really help that rtc-cmos doesn't load on this machine, but 
I'll try to track that down later - right now I suspect some sort of PNP 
issue)
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

             reply	other threads:[~2007-05-27 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-27 19:03 Matthew Garrett [this message]
2007-05-27 23:39 ` RTC_DRV_CMOS can break userspace interface Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28  0:38   ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28  1:44     ` David Brownell
2007-05-28  2:16       ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28  7:45         ` Matthieu CASTET
2007-05-28 19:16           ` Matthew Garrett
2007-05-28  1:36 ` David Brownell
     [not found] <8pwhX-46n-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <8pCQo-5QL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <87abvogbdp.fsf@buer.dfakt.de>
2007-05-28 21:06     ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070527190351.GA21387@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox