From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Shai Fultheim <shai@scalex86.org>,
Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/12] acpi: fix another compile warning
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:36:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706200936.31236.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070620084911.GO5193@alberich.amd.com>
On Wednesday 20 June 2007 04:49, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:38:02PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 18:50, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > Avoid compile warning if !ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR
> > >
> > > CC drivers/acpi/blacklist.o
> > > drivers/acpi/blacklist.c:76:5: warning: "CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR" is not defined
> >
> > How were you able to produce a .config with CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR not defined?
>
> Initially I used randconfig. But you can easily create it using
> "make menuconfig", too.
>
> Just do "make mrproper && make menuconfig" and now
> deselect CONFIG_PM. On x86_64 ACPI keeps enabled by default.
As CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM, then if you are able to end up
with a config having ACPI && !PM, then the Kconfig system is broken.
The brokeness is x86_64 specific, and results from the "select ACPI" below.
Please test if this single patch fixes all your multiple ACPI related build errors.
I fear, however, that this patch defeats the purpose of
b0bd35e622ffbda2c01dc67a0381c6a18817a29a -- which was to make selecting
NUMA more user-friendly. So it might make more sense to simply revert that
patch entirely.
The underlying problem is that Kconfig doesn't support using select
on targets which themselves have dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/Kconfig b/arch/x86_64/Kconfig
index 5ce9443..e9d7767 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86_64/Kconfig
@@ -364,9 +364,9 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
config X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
bool "ACPI NUMA detection"
depends on NUMA
- select ACPI
+ depends on ACPI
select PCI
- select ACPI_NUMA
+ depends on ACPI_NUMA
default y
help
Enable ACPI SRAT based node topology detection.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-20 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 22:50 [PATCH 7/12] acpi: fix another compile warning Andreas Herrmann
2007-06-20 3:38 ` Len Brown
2007-06-20 3:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-20 3:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-20 4:41 ` Len Brown
2007-06-20 9:31 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-06-20 14:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-20 8:49 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-06-20 13:36 ` Len Brown [this message]
2007-06-20 13:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-20 18:25 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-06-21 18:36 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-06-22 14:39 ` Andreas Herrmann
2007-06-23 3:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-23 4:28 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200706200936.31236.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox