From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 8/8] PM: Rename hibernation_ops to platform_hibernation_operations Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:19:56 +0200 Message-ID: <200706271719.57337.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200706242239.05678.rjw@sisk.pl> <200706260052.28206.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070626085423.GC4594@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:49856 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759114AbXF0PM4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:12:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070626085423.GC4594@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: pm list , Alan Stern , David Brownell , linux acpi , Len Brown , Shaohua Li , Johannes Berg , Igor Stoppa On Tuesday, 26 June 2007 10:54, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_operations' in > > analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_operations'. > > Can I NAK it because it gets too long? platform_hibernation_ops / > platform_suspend_ops is long but maybe acceptable, 'struct > platform_hibernation_operations' is too long. Okay, I can change both to platform_suspend_ops and platform_hibernation_ops (should be mutually consistent IMO). Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth