From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jordan Crouse" Subject: Re: add powerbutton and lid platform devices Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:36:10 -0600 Message-ID: <20070709163610.GG31533@cosmic.amd.com> References: <20070330235759.GC4252@cosmic.amd.com> <20070708221027.GA4964@dmt> <20070709150545.GD31533@cosmic.amd.com> <200707090930.26973.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200707090930.26973.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devel-bounces@lists.laptop.org Errors-To: devel-bounces@lists.laptop.org To: David Brownell Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, devel@laptop.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 09/07/07 09:30 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Lid behavior is so policy > > driven, I think we should leave it off by default, and let the power manager > > decide what to do. > > What's this "power manager" component? > > This policy is easily set through sysfs. It doesn't need a new > component to make that decision. I'm talking about OHM for userspace policy decisions. But you are correct. It all boils down to a single sysfs knob for the kernel. Nothing more is needed. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.