From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH] hook acpi d-state to pnp suspend/resume Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:38:02 -0700 Message-ID: <200707211238.03089.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1184897000.26022.17.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.94]:21622 "HELO smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758004AbXGUTk2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:40:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1184897000.26022.17.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Shaohua Li Cc: linux acpi , Adam Belay , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown On Thursday 19 July 2007, Shaohua Li wrote: > > applied after Rafel's 'PM: Update global suspend and hibernation > operations framework' patch set > > Hook acpi d-state to pnp suspend/resume. > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li Looks about right, and I know the "punt to the PNP protocol handler" approach will make Dmitry happy (for input devices); it's very "hands-off". How much has this been tested? Have you verified that, for example, PS/2 keyboards and mice now pay proper attention to the driver model wakeup flags? Unfortunately I don't have any system available for testing this patch. - Dave