From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 00/17] PNP Lindent Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:08:52 -0700 Message-ID: <20070723150852.9c6fb23d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070723212757.122218147@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:38501 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911AbXGWWKC (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:10:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070723212757.122218147@ldl.fc.hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: helgaas@ldl.fc.hp.com Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Adam Belay , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:27:57 -0600 helgaas@ldl.fc.hp.com wrote: > Run PNP files through Lindent. These patches are all completely > independent and contain no functional changes. Object files before > and after are identical. > > These are against current upstream. If you prefer a different base > or drop some of these due to conflicts with things already in -mm, > let me know and I can regenerate them. > eep, this is the worst time for me to merge this stuff: I get to carry large diffs against lots of files for two months. The best time to do this would be late(ish) in the 2.6.24 merge window. Can we do it then? (Lindent tends to make a bit of a mess, btw: followon manual fixups are usually needed)