From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:37:55 +0200 Message-ID: <200709201437.56431.elendil@planet.nl> References: <200709192014.08443.elendil@planet.nl> <20070920105312.GC12157@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.38.118]:41627 "EHLO hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753288AbXITMh6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:37:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070920105312.GC12157@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 September 2007, you wrote: > > When compared with 2.6.22-4, dmesg no longer lists S4 and S5 as > > supported for my Toshiba Satellite A40 laptop (Mobile Intel Pentium 4, > > 2.8GHz). > > > > -Linux version 2.6.22-2-686 (Debian 2.6.22-4) (waldi@debian.org) ... > > +Linux version 2.6.23-rc6 (root@faramir) ... > > [...] > > -ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) > > +ACPI: (supports S0 S3) > > Unexpected, and potentially pretty serious. Something went wrong with > ACPI. Can you try to narrow down when it started happening? rc1 still had all 4 levels. I'll run a bisect between rc1 and rc6.